Friday, July 25, 2008

From Wall Street

Railroads, Packing Pricing Power, Deliver Big Profits
Union Pacific's Jump In Earnings Is in Line With Robust Industry's
By ALEX ROTH - July 25, 2008;

If the U.S. economy is deteriorating, could someone please tell the railroad industry?

Profits for several railroad companies are surging as they exercise their power to raise prices, in part because they remain a cheaper alternative to trucks and other less fuel-efficient modes of transportation. Union Pacific Corp., the largest U.S. freight railroad operator by revenue, reported a 19% jump in second-quarter net income, despite a 3% drop in carloads, a 54% jump in fuel costs and a variety of logistical issues associated with recent Midwest flooding.

Last week, CSX Corp. also reported a 19% profit increase for the second quarter, while Norfolk Southern Corp. said Tuesday that second-quarter profits rose 15%. Burlington Northern Sante Fe Corp. said Thursday that net income fell 19%, but the results included charges mostly related to an environmental cleanup in Montana. Without the charges, Burlington Northern said profits rose 25%.

The railroad companies are far more fuel-efficient than trucks and relatively cheaper as fuel prices soar. Even more, some railroad customers, for logistical reasons, can't ship their freight any other way.

As a result, beyond fuel surcharges, the railroads have been able to raise their rates "even in this tough economy," said Anthony Hatch, an independent transportation analyst -- a fact that has rankled customers but delighted shareholders.

Mr. Hatch also cited the industry's "very diverse traffic base" as a reason for its successes. While volumes of auto parts, lumber and other materials connected to the automotive and housing industries have sagged, demand for coal, metals and agricultural products remains robust, in part because of surging exports. While revenue in Union Pacific's automotive segment fell 9%, agricultural freight revenue rose 29%.

Union Pacific, CSX and a smaller railroad, Kansas City Southern Corp., have also improved efficiency in the past five years, according to analyst Rick Paterson of UBS Investment Research, calling their financial results in part "an internal productivity story."

Union Pacific's results handily beat Wall Street's expectations. Net income rose to $531 million, or $1.02 a share, from $446 million, or 82 cents a share, a year ago. The Omaha, Neb., company warned last month that earnings would be reduced by about five cents a share and come in at the low end of its estimate range of 90 cents to 98 cents due to severe weather. The mean forecast by analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters was for 92 cents a share.
Revenue rose 13% to $4.57 billion.

Burlington Northern, the second-largest freight operator after Union Pacific, said net income dropped to $350 million, or $1 a share, from $433 million, or $1.20 a share, in the year-earlier quarter. The results included charges of 34 cents a share for the environmental cleanup and personal-injury accruals. Burlington Northern lowered its earnings projection to $1.30 a share last month due to the severe weather.

Union Pacific Chief Executive Jim Young said that while customers aren't happy with the higher prices, they also continually urge expanding capacity. "If you believe that railroads are going to be part of the solution moving forward, we need to keep adding capital and these returns need to move up," he said, adding that the company plans to spend $1 billion in the next year on expansion-related projects.

In 4 p.m. composite trading on the New York Stock Exchange, Union Pacific was down 15 cents to $77.18. Burlington Northern, which released results after 4 p.m., was up $1.23 to $100 in after-hours trading, also on NYSE.

Looking for Blog Authors

If you would like to help manage this blog and become a Blog Author, please send me an e-mail at REFlynn@usa.net. All can post comments to posts, but only approved authors can initiate a broadcast post to all subscribers. If you would like to help, let me know.

What happened to the old Conrail.Net

After 10 years, we finally had a technical issue with the old conrail.net web site. Unfortunately, the hosting provider corrupted the site and was not able to recover the database. There were other problems with the domain name that have now been resolved.
The site was originally launched in June 1999 to enable former employees to share their contact information. We were ahead of our time. There are now many social networking sites that allow this.
The site, though expensive to maintain, served a purpose -- and I was reluctant to completely pull the plug. So we are converting it to a blog to enable folks to post comments and broadcast information to former work colleagues.
In addition, we have set up a networking group at http://www.linkedin.com/ that will enable sharing of contact information. The group name is "Conrail". We hope everyone will take advantage of this service and take the time to join.

Comments?

This blog permits former Conrail Employees to post comments.

Rail Stocks